Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (0.71 vs 1.29, Δ 0.58).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 18%).
- Antwerp held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 0.71 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 372Lead | Accurate passes | 301 |
| 458Lead | Total passes | 387 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.