Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (0.59 vs 1.93, Δ 1.34).
- Genk fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 0.59 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.93Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 412Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 504Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.