Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 1.15, Δ 0.11).
- Antwerp fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- KVC Westerlo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15Lead |
| 4Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 532Lead | Accurate passes | 265 |
| 641Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |