Match statistics snapshot
- Aparecidense fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Cascavel was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Cascavel |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 4Lead | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Cascavel |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Cascavel |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Cascavel |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Cascavel |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.