Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Aparecidense was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3Lead |
| 1 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 372Lead | Accurate passes | 355 |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 410 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |