Match statistics snapshot
- Tombense created the clearer chances on xG (0.85 vs 1.05, Δ 0.20).
- Tombense fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Aparecidense was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Tombense |
|---|---|---|
| 0.85 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Tombense |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 328 | Accurate passes | 414Lead |
| 387 | Total passes | 478Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Tombense |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Tombense |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aparecidense | Statistic | Tombense |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 7 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.