Match statistics snapshot
- Anorthosis created the clearer chances on xG (0.50 vs 1.65, Δ 1.15).
- Apoel Nicosia fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Apoel Nicosia was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Anorthosis |
|---|---|---|
| 0.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.65Lead |
| 0 | Offsides | 0 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Anorthosis |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 440Lead | Accurate passes | 267 |
| 529Lead | Total passes | 331 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Anorthosis |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Anorthosis |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Anorthosis |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |