Match statistics snapshot
- Apoel Nicosia created the clearer chances on xG (2.58 vs 0.32, Δ 2.26).
- Apoel Nicosia fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Apoel Nicosia was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 2.58Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.32 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 614Lead | Accurate passes | 281 |
| 693Lead | Total passes | 331 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |