Match statistics snapshot
- Apoel Nicosia created the clearer chances on xG (1.84 vs 0.12, Δ 1.72).
- Apoel Nicosia fired more attempts (21 vs 4 shots).
- Enosis was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 1.84Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.12 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 471Lead | Accurate passes | 261 |
| 543Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.