Match statistics snapshot
- Pafos created the clearer chances on xG (0.90 vs 1.47, Δ 0.57).
- Pafos was more accurate in front of goal (20% on target vs 10%).
- Pafos held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 0.90 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.47Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 223 | Accurate passes | 342Lead |
| 293 | Total passes | 412Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.