Match statistics snapshot
- Apoel Nicosia fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Rīgas FS was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
- Apoel Nicosia held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Apoel Nicosia | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 7 |
Statistics is not available yet.