Match statistics snapshot
- Arges Pitesti created the clearer chances on xG (1.68 vs 1.54, Δ 0.14).
- CFR 1907 Cluj fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Arges Pitesti was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Arges Pitesti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1.68Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.54 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Arges Pitesti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 165 | Accurate passes | 319Lead |
| 267 | Total passes | 429Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Arges Pitesti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Arges Pitesti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Arges Pitesti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.