Match statistics snapshot
- Arges Pitesti created the clearer chances on xG (2.21 vs 1.72, Δ 0.49).
- Arges Pitesti fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Arges Pitesti was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Arges Pitesti | Statistic | Metaloglobus |
|---|---|---|
| 2.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72 |
| Offsides | ||
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Arges Pitesti | Statistic | Metaloglobus |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 173 | Accurate passes | 375Lead |
| 261 | Total passes | 462Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Arges Pitesti | Statistic | Metaloglobus |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Arges Pitesti | Statistic | Metaloglobus |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Arges Pitesti | Statistic | Metaloglobus |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.