Match statistics snapshot
- Arminia Bielefeld created the clearer chances on xG (5.07 vs 1.33, Δ 3.74).
- Arminia Bielefeld fired more attempts (27 vs 9 shots).
- Arminia Bielefeld was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Arminia Bielefeld | Statistic | Hertha Bsc |
|---|---|---|
| 5.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.33 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Arminia Bielefeld | Statistic | Hertha Bsc |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 286Lead | Accurate passes | 233 |
| 368Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Arminia Bielefeld | Statistic | Hertha Bsc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Arminia Bielefeld | Statistic | Hertha Bsc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.11 | Goals prevented | 0.11 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Arminia Bielefeld | Statistic | Hertha Bsc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |