Match statistics snapshot
- Arouca created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 1.23, Δ 0.57).
- Arouca fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Famalicao was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Arouca | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Arouca | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 292Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 375Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Arouca | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Arouca | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Arouca | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 17 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.