Match statistics snapshot
- Arouca created the clearer chances on xG (3.21 vs 0.98, Δ 2.23).
- Arouca fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Famalicao was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 53%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Arouca | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 3.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Arouca | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 329Lead | Accurate passes | 207 |
| 407Lead | Total passes | 283 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Arouca | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Arouca | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.60 | Goals prevented | 1.60 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Arouca | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.