Match statistics snapshot
- Arouca created the clearer chances on xG (2.31 vs 0.97, Δ 1.34).
- Arouca fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Arouca | Statistic | Vizela |
|---|---|---|
| 2.31Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Arouca | Statistic | Vizela |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 342 | Accurate passes | 373Lead |
| 432 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Arouca | Statistic | Vizela |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Arouca | Statistic | Vizela |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Arouca | Statistic | Vizela |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |