Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 3.84, Δ 2.92).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (25 vs 8 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
0.92 | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 3.84Lead |
1 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1 |
7 | Shots inside the box | 23Lead |
5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
8 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 25Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
66% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
169 | Accurate passes | 449Lead |
255 | Total passes | 549Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
2 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 12Lead |
7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Arsenal leads this block
Arsenal leads shot accuracy (+124% vs Crystal Palace)
Arsenal leads shot accuracy (+124% vs Crystal Palace)
Arsenal leads shot quality (+34% vs Crystal Palace)
Arsenal leads (92% vs 88%).
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Arsenal leads this block
Arsenal leads possession efficiency (+88% vs Crystal Palace)
Arsenal leads possession efficiency (+88% vs Crystal Palace)
Crystal Palace — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Arsenal leads this block
Arsenal leads territorial pressure (+284% vs Crystal Palace)
Arsenal leads territorial pressure (+284% vs Crystal Palace)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Arsenal leads this block
Arsenal — stronger shot quality allowed
Arsenal — stronger shot quality allowed
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Arsenal leads this block
Arsenal had the edge in 5 of 6 signals in this block.
Crystal Palace leads (12.0 vs 11.0).
Arsenal leads (56.6 vs 20.5).
Arsenal leads (31.0 vs 9.0).
Arsenal leads (0.154 vs 0.115).
Arsenal leads (88.5 vs 84.6).
Arsenal leads (22.0 vs 14.0).