Match statistics snapshot
- Curaçao fired more attempts (27 vs 4 shots).
- Aruba was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 19%).
- Curaçao held more of the ball (76% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aruba | Statistic | Curaçao |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target |
| 14Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 27Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aruba | Statistic | Curaçao |
|---|---|---|
| 24% | Ball possession | 76%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 104 | Accurate passes | 485Lead |
| 171 | Total passes | 549Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aruba | Statistic | Curaçao |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aruba | Statistic | Curaçao |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aruba | Statistic | Curaçao |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |