Match statistics snapshot
- Anderlecht created the clearer chances on xG (1.03 vs 2.25, Δ 1.22).
- Anderlecht fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 1.03 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.25Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 5 |
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 437 | Accurate passes | 502Lead |
| 538 | Total passes | 588Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |