Match statistics snapshot
- Antwerp created the clearer chances on xG (0.75 vs 1.78, Δ 1.03).
- Antwerp fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- AS Eupen was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.78Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 233 | Accurate passes | 430Lead |
| 333 | Total passes | 533Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |