Match statistics snapshot
- Cercle Brugge created the clearer chances on xG (1.29 vs 2.02, Δ 0.73).
- Cercle Brugge fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Cercle Brugge was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 1.29 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.02Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 50% | Pass accuracy | 59%Lead |
| 191 | Accurate passes | 258Lead |
| 379 | Total passes | 438Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.