Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge II fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Club Brugge II was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Club Brugge II held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 296 | Accurate passes | 466Lead |
| 386 | Total passes | 563Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.