Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge KV created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 2.60, Δ 1.99).
- Club Brugge KV fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Club Brugge KV was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.60Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 256 | Accurate passes | 525Lead |
| 329 | Total passes | 610Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |