Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (0.70 vs 2.99, Δ 2.29).
- Genk fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 0.70 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.99Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 272 | Accurate passes | 368Lead |
| 384 | Total passes | 473Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |