Match statistics snapshot
- AS Eupen fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- AS Eupen was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 27%).
- AS Eupen held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 9 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 402Lead | Accurate passes | 220 |
| 482Lead | Total passes | 311 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |