Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 2.24, Δ 1.20).
- KVC Westerlo fired more attempts (22 vs 13 shots).
- AS Eupen was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.24Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 13Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 308 | Accurate passes | 500Lead |
| 396 | Total passes | 580Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |