Match statistics snapshot
- Lommel United created the clearer chances on xG (0.48 vs 1.88, Δ 1.40).
- Lommel United fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Lommel United was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.48 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.88Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 383 | Accurate passes | 523Lead |
| 447 | Total passes | 589Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |