Match statistics snapshot
- RWDM created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 2.02, Δ 0.91).
- RWDM fired more attempts (21 vs 11 shots).
- RWDM was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.02Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 410Lead | Accurate passes | 404 |
| 485 | Total passes | 487Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Eupen | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |