Match statistics snapshot
- Athletic Club created the clearer chances on xG (0.44 vs 0.79, Δ 0.35).
- Athletic Club fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- AS Roma was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Roma | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 0.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.79Lead |
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Roma | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 504Lead | Accurate passes | 287 |
| 583Lead | Total passes | 374 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Roma | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Roma | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.76 | Goals prevented | -0.76 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Roma | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.