Match statistics snapshot
- AS Roma created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 1.19, Δ 0.01).
- Athletic Club fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- AS Roma was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 6%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Roma | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Roma | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 467Lead | Accurate passes | 303 |
| 554Lead | Total passes | 378 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Roma | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Roma | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.18 | Goals prevented | 0.18 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Roma | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |