Match statistics snapshot
- AS Roma created the clearer chances on xG (2.98 vs 1.03, Δ 1.95).
- AS Roma fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- AS Roma was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Roma | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 2.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Roma | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 325 | Accurate passes | 527Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 579Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Roma | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Roma | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Roma | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |