Match statistics snapshot
- AS Roma created the clearer chances on xG (1.36 vs 1.20, Δ 0.16).
- AS Roma fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Roma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Roma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 441 | Accurate passes | 478Lead |
| 512 | Total passes | 553Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Roma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Roma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.59 | Goals prevented | -0.59 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Roma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 7 |