Match statistics snapshot
- AS Roma created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 0.55, Δ 0.60).
- AS Roma fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- AS Roma was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Roma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Roma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 321Lead | Accurate passes | 279 |
| 396Lead | Total passes | 358 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Roma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Roma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.37 | Goals prevented | -0.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Roma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |