Match statistics snapshot
- AS Roma created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 0.73, Δ 0.24).
- AS Roma fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Roma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| Offsides | ||
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Roma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 387 | Accurate passes | 396Lead |
| 455 | Total passes | 462Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Roma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Roma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Roma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |