Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (0.68 vs 0.95, Δ 0.27).
- Inter fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Roma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0.68 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.95Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Roma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 410 | Accurate passes | 485Lead |
| 478 | Total passes | 544Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Roma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Roma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Roma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |