Match statistics snapshot
- AS Roma created the clearer chances on xG (1.53 vs 1.26, Δ 0.27).
- Pisa fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Pisa was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Roma | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Roma | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 513Lead | Accurate passes | 313 |
| 591Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Roma | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Roma | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.20 | Goals prevented | -1.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Roma | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.