Match statistics snapshot
- AS Roma created the clearer chances on xG (3.00 vs 0.40, Δ 2.60).
- AS Roma fired more attempts (18 vs 4 shots).
- Sheriff Tiraspol was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| As Roma | Statistic | Sheriff Tiraspol |
|---|---|---|
| 3.00Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.40 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| As Roma | Statistic | Sheriff Tiraspol |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 570Lead | Accurate passes | 355 |
| 645Lead | Total passes | 423 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| As Roma | Statistic | Sheriff Tiraspol |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| As Roma | Statistic | Sheriff Tiraspol |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| As Roma | Statistic | Sheriff Tiraspol |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.