Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Petah Tikva fired more attempts (6 vs 4 shots).
- Maccabi Petah Tikva was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 50%).
- Maccabi Petah Tikva held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ashdod | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 6Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ashdod | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 162 | Accurate passes | 348Lead |
| 249 | Total passes | 423Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ashdod | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ashdod | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ashdod | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.