Match statistics snapshot
- Brighton created the clearer chances on xG (0.50 vs 0.72, Δ 0.22).
- Brighton fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Aston Villa was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Brighton | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
0.50 | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 0.72Lead |
3 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 0Lead |
7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
5 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
9 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 15Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Brighton | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
50% | Ball possession | 50% |
83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
348Lead | Accurate passes | 342 |
418 | Total passes | 418 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Brighton | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Brighton | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
1 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 4Lead |
2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
-0.84 | Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. | -0.84 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Brighton | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Brighton leads this block
Brighton leads shot accuracy (+400% vs Aston Villa)
Brighton leads shot accuracy (+400% vs Aston Villa)
Brighton leads shot quality (+16% vs Aston Villa)
Brighton leads box penetration (+17% vs Aston Villa)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Aston Villa leads this block
Aston Villa leads possession efficiency (+44% vs Brighton)
Aston Villa leads possession efficiency (+44% vs Brighton)
Brighton — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Aston Villa leads this block
Aston Villa leads territorial pressure (+39% vs Brighton)
Aston Villa leads territorial pressure (+39% vs Brighton)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Brighton leads this block
Brighton — stronger shot quality allowed
Brighton — stronger shot quality allowed
Brighton leads keeper workload (+116% vs Aston Villa)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Brighton leads this block
Brighton had the edge in 5 of 6 signals in this block.
Brighton leads (21.0 vs 13.0).
Brighton leads (41.5 vs 41.0).
Aston Villa leads (17.0 vs 12.0).
Brighton leads (0.056 vs 0.048).
Brighton leads (95.2 vs 94.4).
Brighton leads (19.0 vs 15.0).