Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 1.12, Δ 0.32).
- Inter fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atalanta | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atalanta | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 355 | Accurate passes | 461Lead |
| 424 | Total passes | 529Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atalanta | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atalanta | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atalanta | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |