Match statistics snapshot
- Athletic Club created the clearer chances on xG (2.11 vs 1.31, Δ 0.80).
- Amazonas fired more attempts (23 vs 22 shots).
- Athletic Club held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 22 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 281Lead | Accurate passes | 205 |
| 368Lead | Total passes | 285 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Corner kicks | 9 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |