Match statistics snapshot
- Athletic Club created the clearer chances on xG (0.85 vs 0.40, Δ 0.45).
- Athletic Club fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Barcelona held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Barcelona |
|---|---|---|
0.85Lead | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 0.40 |
7 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 4Lead |
7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
6Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
10Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 7 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Barcelona |
|---|---|---|
30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
75% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
196 | Accurate passes | 586Lead |
262 | Total passes | 658Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Barcelona |
|---|---|---|
2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Barcelona |
|---|---|---|
1 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 2Lead |
2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
0.49 | Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. | 0.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Barcelona |
|---|---|---|
11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Athletic Club leads this block
Athletic Club leads shot quality (+49% vs Barcelona)
Athletic Club leads (30% vs 29%).
Athletic Club leads shot quality (+49% vs Barcelona)
Barcelona leads (71% vs 70%).
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Athletic Club leads this block
Athletic Club leads possession efficiency (+396% vs Barcelona)
Athletic Club leads possession efficiency (+396% vs Barcelona)
Barcelona — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Athletic Club leads this block
Athletic Club had the edge in 1 of 1 signals in this block.
Athletic Club leads (20 vs 18).
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Athletic Club — stronger shot quality allowed
Athletic Club — stronger shot quality allowed
Barcelona leads keeper workload (+42% vs Athletic Club)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Athletic Club leads this block
Athletic Club had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.
Athletic Club leads (15.0 vs 11.0).
Barcelona leads (62.3 vs 22.5).
Even on this measure.
Athletic Club leads (0.085 vs 0.057).
Athletic Club leads (94.3 vs 91.5).
Athletic Club leads (14.0 vs 12.0).