Match statistics snapshot
- Celta Vigo created the clearer chances on xG (0.79 vs 1.33, Δ 0.54).
- Celta Vigo fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Athletic Club was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.79 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.33Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 248 | Accurate passes | 558Lead |
| 304 | Total passes | 636Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.94 | Goals prevented | -0.94 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.