Match statistics snapshot
- Athletic Club created the clearer chances on xG (2.49 vs 0.15, Δ 2.34).
- Athletic Club fired more attempts (27 vs 3 shots).
- Celta Vigo was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.15 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 448Lead | Accurate passes | 309 |
| 528Lead | Total passes | 392 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 0.73 | Goals prevented | 0.73 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.