Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 1.78, Δ 0.70).
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.78Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 288 | Accurate passes | 312Lead |
| 348 | Total passes | 363Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.