Match statistics snapshot
- Athletic Club created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 0.52, Δ 0.64).
- Athletic Club fired more attempts (6 vs 5 shots).
- Coritiba was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.52 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 338 | Accurate passes | 500Lead |
| 396 | Total passes | 555Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |