Match statistics snapshot
- Athletic Club created the clearer chances on xG (2.13 vs 1.49, Δ 0.64).
- Athletic Club fired more attempts (21 vs 9 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 2.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 476Lead | Accurate passes | 127 |
| 551Lead | Total passes | 199 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.