Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma created the clearer chances on xG (0.70 vs 1.57, Δ 0.87).
- Criciuma fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Athletic Club was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 0.70 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.57Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 201 | Accurate passes | 410Lead |
| 264 | Total passes | 493Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.60 | Goals prevented | -1.60 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.