Match statistics snapshot
- Athletic Club created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 0.27, Δ 1.16).
- Athletic Club fired more attempts (19 vs 2 shots).
- Athletic Club was more accurate in front of goal (32% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.27 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 579Lead | Accurate passes | 211 |
| 647Lead | Total passes | 280 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -1.06 | Goals prevented | -1.06 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.